Where have we been and where are we going? A conceptual framework for child advocacy

Michele Cascardi, Cathy Brown, Svetlana Shpiegel, Ariel Alvarez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary goal of this article is to chart the development of child advocacy as an interdisciplinary field of study and conclude with a conceptual framework for research and higher education in child advocacy. Historically, child advocacy has justifiably focused on protection needs. Values and assumptions about children's best interest have also governed child advocacy, in part because evidence to inform decisions was lacking and in part because of its history as an activist movement. Against this historical backdrop, we describe contemporary trends in child advocacy that reconcile children's protection with their inherent rights to personhood. We rely on the principles and articles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, most notably children's rights to participation and self-expression. At the same time, we demonstrate how values and ideology are being integrated with empiricism and objective analysis to inform policy and practice in child advocacy. The future of child advocacy depends on continued synthesis of rights and protection as well as values and rigorous analysis. From this perspective, we offer a conceptual framework for research and education in child advocacy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSAGE Open
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Advocacy
Conceptual Framework
Values
empiricism
children's rights
child protection
field of study
UNO
education
ideology
participation
trend
history
evidence
United Nations
Field of Study
Education
Activists
History
Child Protection

Keywords

  • Child advocates
  • Child protection
  • Children's rights
  • Empirical analysis
  • Ideology

Cite this

@article{1ad16eed8c404eadbf6fdc34f02da27c,
title = "Where have we been and where are we going? A conceptual framework for child advocacy",
abstract = "The primary goal of this article is to chart the development of child advocacy as an interdisciplinary field of study and conclude with a conceptual framework for research and higher education in child advocacy. Historically, child advocacy has justifiably focused on protection needs. Values and assumptions about children's best interest have also governed child advocacy, in part because evidence to inform decisions was lacking and in part because of its history as an activist movement. Against this historical backdrop, we describe contemporary trends in child advocacy that reconcile children's protection with their inherent rights to personhood. We rely on the principles and articles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, most notably children's rights to participation and self-expression. At the same time, we demonstrate how values and ideology are being integrated with empiricism and objective analysis to inform policy and practice in child advocacy. The future of child advocacy depends on continued synthesis of rights and protection as well as values and rigorous analysis. From this perspective, we offer a conceptual framework for research and education in child advocacy.",
keywords = "Child advocates, Child protection, Children's rights, Empirical analysis, Ideology",
author = "Michele Cascardi and Cathy Brown and Svetlana Shpiegel and Ariel Alvarez",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2158244015576763",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "SAGE Open",
issn = "2158-2440",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Where have we been and where are we going? A conceptual framework for child advocacy. / Cascardi, Michele; Brown, Cathy; Shpiegel, Svetlana; Alvarez, Ariel.

In: SAGE Open, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where have we been and where are we going? A conceptual framework for child advocacy

AU - Cascardi, Michele

AU - Brown, Cathy

AU - Shpiegel, Svetlana

AU - Alvarez, Ariel

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The primary goal of this article is to chart the development of child advocacy as an interdisciplinary field of study and conclude with a conceptual framework for research and higher education in child advocacy. Historically, child advocacy has justifiably focused on protection needs. Values and assumptions about children's best interest have also governed child advocacy, in part because evidence to inform decisions was lacking and in part because of its history as an activist movement. Against this historical backdrop, we describe contemporary trends in child advocacy that reconcile children's protection with their inherent rights to personhood. We rely on the principles and articles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, most notably children's rights to participation and self-expression. At the same time, we demonstrate how values and ideology are being integrated with empiricism and objective analysis to inform policy and practice in child advocacy. The future of child advocacy depends on continued synthesis of rights and protection as well as values and rigorous analysis. From this perspective, we offer a conceptual framework for research and education in child advocacy.

AB - The primary goal of this article is to chart the development of child advocacy as an interdisciplinary field of study and conclude with a conceptual framework for research and higher education in child advocacy. Historically, child advocacy has justifiably focused on protection needs. Values and assumptions about children's best interest have also governed child advocacy, in part because evidence to inform decisions was lacking and in part because of its history as an activist movement. Against this historical backdrop, we describe contemporary trends in child advocacy that reconcile children's protection with their inherent rights to personhood. We rely on the principles and articles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, most notably children's rights to participation and self-expression. At the same time, we demonstrate how values and ideology are being integrated with empiricism and objective analysis to inform policy and practice in child advocacy. The future of child advocacy depends on continued synthesis of rights and protection as well as values and rigorous analysis. From this perspective, we offer a conceptual framework for research and education in child advocacy.

KW - Child advocates

KW - Child protection

KW - Children's rights

KW - Empirical analysis

KW - Ideology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927733096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2158244015576763

DO - 10.1177/2158244015576763

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84927733096

VL - 5

JO - SAGE Open

JF - SAGE Open

SN - 2158-2440

IS - 1

ER -