Who Has the Body? The Paths to Habeas Corpus Reform

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to place the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) of 1996 within a political and historical framework that describes the effort by the Supreme Court and various interested parties to restrict prisoners’ access to the federal courts by way of habeas corpus. Of principal concern here is how an act of terrorism against the United States provides an opportunity for Congress to restrict death row prisoners from obtaining habeas corpus review. Along with an analysis of Supreme Court decisions, three attempts to limit federal habeas corpus review for state prisoners from the late 1980s to the middle 1990s are described, all of which helped Congress to pass the AEDPA, a law that ratified the Supreme Court's most restrictive habeas corpus decisions dating back some 35 years.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-339
Number of pages23
JournalThe Prison Journal
Volume84
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2004

Fingerprint

prisoner
Supreme Court
death penalty
reform
act
court decision
terrorism
death
Law

Keywords

  • Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
  • Supreme Court
  • antiterrorism law
  • death penalty
  • habeas corpus

Cite this

@article{af1c7d97ba8243c2a11766d20e81710b,
title = "Who Has the Body? The Paths to Habeas Corpus Reform",
abstract = "The purpose of this article is to place the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) of 1996 within a political and historical framework that describes the effort by the Supreme Court and various interested parties to restrict prisoners{\^a}€™ access to the federal courts by way of habeas corpus. Of principal concern here is how an act of terrorism against the United States provides an opportunity for Congress to restrict death row prisoners from obtaining habeas corpus review. Along with an analysis of Supreme Court decisions, three attempts to limit federal habeas corpus review for state prisoners from the late 1980s to the middle 1990s are described, all of which helped Congress to pass the AEDPA, a law that ratified the Supreme Court's most restrictive habeas corpus decisions dating back some 35 years.",
keywords = "Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Supreme Court, antiterrorism law, death penalty, habeas corpus",
author = "Cary Federman",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0032885504268180",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "317--339",
journal = "Prison Journal",
issn = "0032-8855",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Who Has the Body? The Paths to Habeas Corpus Reform. / Federman, Cary.

In: The Prison Journal, Vol. 84, No. 3, 01.01.2004, p. 317-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Has the Body? The Paths to Habeas Corpus Reform

AU - Federman, Cary

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this article is to place the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) of 1996 within a political and historical framework that describes the effort by the Supreme Court and various interested parties to restrict prisoners’ access to the federal courts by way of habeas corpus. Of principal concern here is how an act of terrorism against the United States provides an opportunity for Congress to restrict death row prisoners from obtaining habeas corpus review. Along with an analysis of Supreme Court decisions, three attempts to limit federal habeas corpus review for state prisoners from the late 1980s to the middle 1990s are described, all of which helped Congress to pass the AEDPA, a law that ratified the Supreme Court's most restrictive habeas corpus decisions dating back some 35 years.

AB - The purpose of this article is to place the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) of 1996 within a political and historical framework that describes the effort by the Supreme Court and various interested parties to restrict prisoners’ access to the federal courts by way of habeas corpus. Of principal concern here is how an act of terrorism against the United States provides an opportunity for Congress to restrict death row prisoners from obtaining habeas corpus review. Along with an analysis of Supreme Court decisions, three attempts to limit federal habeas corpus review for state prisoners from the late 1980s to the middle 1990s are described, all of which helped Congress to pass the AEDPA, a law that ratified the Supreme Court's most restrictive habeas corpus decisions dating back some 35 years.

KW - Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act

KW - Supreme Court

KW - antiterrorism law

KW - death penalty

KW - habeas corpus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344672728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0032885504268180

DO - 10.1177/0032885504268180

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4344672728

VL - 84

SP - 317

EP - 339

JO - Prison Journal

JF - Prison Journal

SN - 0032-8855

IS - 3

ER -