Who is empowered? Relative importance of dispositional and situational sources to psychological empowerment

Daniel Simonet, Katherine E. Miller, Sylvia Luu, Kevin Askew, Anupama Narayan, Sydnie Cunningham, Camila Pena, Amen Attar, Rose Fonseca, Holly M. Kobezak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Major reviews of psychological empowerment (PE) suggest four broad sources to becoming empowered: organizational, leadership, job, and dispositional. This study examines the redundancy, uniqueness, and relative importance within and across these situational and dispositional domains using commonality and dominance analyses. Across multiple samples, we find (a) within socio-structural domains, empowering leadership, knowledge sharing, and task significance are the most unique organizational sources of PE, (b) dispositional predictors augment situational features in explaining PE, and, perhaps most importantly, (c) job characteristics (JC) along with core self-evaluation (CSE) occupy the most dominant role on PE. In study 1 (N = 229), rank and CSE accounted for 64% of the variance in PE after accounting for information distribution, leadership, and the Big Five. Controlling for expanded Big Five inventory, leadership constructs, and socio-structurally features, study 2 (N = 171) finds general dominance of task significance (14%), empowering leadership (19%), and reduced, albeit incremental, effect of CSE (10%). Finally, study 3 (N = 386) replicates the large (30%) and moderately (10%) dominant effects of multiple JC dimensions and CSE. Implications call for a micro-level approach to PE emphasizing expanded roles, broadened self-concept, and personal impact on society rather than inspiring managers or organizational practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536-554
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Psychology
Information Dissemination
Self Concept
Power (Psychology)
Relative importance
Psychological empowerment
Equipment and Supplies
Core self-evaluations
Job characteristics
Big Five

Keywords

  • Psychological empowerment
  • core self-evaluation
  • dominance analyses
  • job characteristics
  • mastery

Cite this

Simonet, Daniel ; Miller, Katherine E. ; Luu, Sylvia ; Askew, Kevin ; Narayan, Anupama ; Cunningham, Sydnie ; Pena, Camila ; Attar, Amen ; Fonseca, Rose ; Kobezak, Holly M. / Who is empowered? Relative importance of dispositional and situational sources to psychological empowerment. In: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 536-554.
@article{6dbd5a7e521f4eb680fb2f4540195786,
title = "Who is empowered? Relative importance of dispositional and situational sources to psychological empowerment",
abstract = "Major reviews of psychological empowerment (PE) suggest four broad sources to becoming empowered: organizational, leadership, job, and dispositional. This study examines the redundancy, uniqueness, and relative importance within and across these situational and dispositional domains using commonality and dominance analyses. Across multiple samples, we find (a) within socio-structural domains, empowering leadership, knowledge sharing, and task significance are the most unique organizational sources of PE, (b) dispositional predictors augment situational features in explaining PE, and, perhaps most importantly, (c) job characteristics (JC) along with core self-evaluation (CSE) occupy the most dominant role on PE. In study 1 (N = 229), rank and CSE accounted for 64{\%} of the variance in PE after accounting for information distribution, leadership, and the Big Five. Controlling for expanded Big Five inventory, leadership constructs, and socio-structurally features, study 2 (N = 171) finds general dominance of task significance (14{\%}), empowering leadership (19{\%}), and reduced, albeit incremental, effect of CSE (10{\%}). Finally, study 3 (N = 386) replicates the large (30{\%}) and moderately (10{\%}) dominant effects of multiple JC dimensions and CSE. Implications call for a micro-level approach to PE emphasizing expanded roles, broadened self-concept, and personal impact on society rather than inspiring managers or organizational practices.",
keywords = "Psychological empowerment, core self-evaluation, dominance analyses, job characteristics, mastery",
author = "Daniel Simonet and Miller, {Katherine E.} and Sylvia Luu and Kevin Askew and Anupama Narayan and Sydnie Cunningham and Camila Pena and Amen Attar and Rose Fonseca and Kobezak, {Holly M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/1359432X.2019.1624532",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "536--554",
journal = "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology",
issn = "1359-432X",
number = "4",

}

Who is empowered? Relative importance of dispositional and situational sources to psychological empowerment. / Simonet, Daniel; Miller, Katherine E.; Luu, Sylvia; Askew, Kevin; Narayan, Anupama; Cunningham, Sydnie; Pena, Camila; Attar, Amen; Fonseca, Rose; Kobezak, Holly M.

In: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 4, 04.07.2019, p. 536-554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who is empowered? Relative importance of dispositional and situational sources to psychological empowerment

AU - Simonet, Daniel

AU - Miller, Katherine E.

AU - Luu, Sylvia

AU - Askew, Kevin

AU - Narayan, Anupama

AU - Cunningham, Sydnie

AU - Pena, Camila

AU - Attar, Amen

AU - Fonseca, Rose

AU - Kobezak, Holly M.

PY - 2019/7/4

Y1 - 2019/7/4

N2 - Major reviews of psychological empowerment (PE) suggest four broad sources to becoming empowered: organizational, leadership, job, and dispositional. This study examines the redundancy, uniqueness, and relative importance within and across these situational and dispositional domains using commonality and dominance analyses. Across multiple samples, we find (a) within socio-structural domains, empowering leadership, knowledge sharing, and task significance are the most unique organizational sources of PE, (b) dispositional predictors augment situational features in explaining PE, and, perhaps most importantly, (c) job characteristics (JC) along with core self-evaluation (CSE) occupy the most dominant role on PE. In study 1 (N = 229), rank and CSE accounted for 64% of the variance in PE after accounting for information distribution, leadership, and the Big Five. Controlling for expanded Big Five inventory, leadership constructs, and socio-structurally features, study 2 (N = 171) finds general dominance of task significance (14%), empowering leadership (19%), and reduced, albeit incremental, effect of CSE (10%). Finally, study 3 (N = 386) replicates the large (30%) and moderately (10%) dominant effects of multiple JC dimensions and CSE. Implications call for a micro-level approach to PE emphasizing expanded roles, broadened self-concept, and personal impact on society rather than inspiring managers or organizational practices.

AB - Major reviews of psychological empowerment (PE) suggest four broad sources to becoming empowered: organizational, leadership, job, and dispositional. This study examines the redundancy, uniqueness, and relative importance within and across these situational and dispositional domains using commonality and dominance analyses. Across multiple samples, we find (a) within socio-structural domains, empowering leadership, knowledge sharing, and task significance are the most unique organizational sources of PE, (b) dispositional predictors augment situational features in explaining PE, and, perhaps most importantly, (c) job characteristics (JC) along with core self-evaluation (CSE) occupy the most dominant role on PE. In study 1 (N = 229), rank and CSE accounted for 64% of the variance in PE after accounting for information distribution, leadership, and the Big Five. Controlling for expanded Big Five inventory, leadership constructs, and socio-structurally features, study 2 (N = 171) finds general dominance of task significance (14%), empowering leadership (19%), and reduced, albeit incremental, effect of CSE (10%). Finally, study 3 (N = 386) replicates the large (30%) and moderately (10%) dominant effects of multiple JC dimensions and CSE. Implications call for a micro-level approach to PE emphasizing expanded roles, broadened self-concept, and personal impact on society rather than inspiring managers or organizational practices.

KW - Psychological empowerment

KW - core self-evaluation

KW - dominance analyses

KW - job characteristics

KW - mastery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067051803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1359432X.2019.1624532

DO - 10.1080/1359432X.2019.1624532

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 536

EP - 554

JO - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

JF - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

SN - 1359-432X

IS - 4

ER -