Withstanding moral disengagement

Attachment security as an ethical intervention

Dolly Chugh, Mary C. Kern, Zhu Zhu, Sujin Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose an ethical intervention leading to improved ethical decision-making. Moral disengagement has long been related to unethical decision-making. We test an ethical intervention in which this relationship is broken. Our ethical intervention consisted of priming individuals to be securely-attached, in which they recalled a past instance of relational support and acceptance. We predicted and found an interaction between attachment state and moral disengagement, in which individuals primed with attachment security were able to withstand moral disengagement. In Study 1, we demonstrate that the securely attached behave more ethically than the anxiously attached in an achievement context. In Study 2, we show that secure attachment overrides one's natural propensity to morally disengage. In Study 3, we find that secure attachment minimizes the impact of the propensity to morally disengage through the mechanism of threat construal. Within both student and working adult samples and using both judgment and behavioral dependent variables, we show that the priming of secure attachment is a relatively simple and effective intervention that managers, educators, and organizations can use to reduce unethical behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-93
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume51
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

disengagement
Decision Making
Students
decision making
acceptance
educator
manager
threat
interaction
student

Keywords

  • Attachment theory
  • Ethical intervention
  • Ethics
  • Moral disengagement
  • Morality

Cite this

@article{5badbdc01a0c4db1a509deb80f405138,
title = "Withstanding moral disengagement: Attachment security as an ethical intervention",
abstract = "We propose an ethical intervention leading to improved ethical decision-making. Moral disengagement has long been related to unethical decision-making. We test an ethical intervention in which this relationship is broken. Our ethical intervention consisted of priming individuals to be securely-attached, in which they recalled a past instance of relational support and acceptance. We predicted and found an interaction between attachment state and moral disengagement, in which individuals primed with attachment security were able to withstand moral disengagement. In Study 1, we demonstrate that the securely attached behave more ethically than the anxiously attached in an achievement context. In Study 2, we show that secure attachment overrides one's natural propensity to morally disengage. In Study 3, we find that secure attachment minimizes the impact of the propensity to morally disengage through the mechanism of threat construal. Within both student and working adult samples and using both judgment and behavioral dependent variables, we show that the priming of secure attachment is a relatively simple and effective intervention that managers, educators, and organizations can use to reduce unethical behavior.",
keywords = "Attachment theory, Ethical intervention, Ethics, Moral disengagement, Morality",
author = "Dolly Chugh and Kern, {Mary C.} and Zhu Zhu and Sujin Lee",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.005",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "88--93",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Withstanding moral disengagement : Attachment security as an ethical intervention. / Chugh, Dolly; Kern, Mary C.; Zhu, Zhu; Lee, Sujin.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 51, 01.03.2014, p. 88-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Withstanding moral disengagement

T2 - Attachment security as an ethical intervention

AU - Chugh, Dolly

AU - Kern, Mary C.

AU - Zhu, Zhu

AU - Lee, Sujin

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - We propose an ethical intervention leading to improved ethical decision-making. Moral disengagement has long been related to unethical decision-making. We test an ethical intervention in which this relationship is broken. Our ethical intervention consisted of priming individuals to be securely-attached, in which they recalled a past instance of relational support and acceptance. We predicted and found an interaction between attachment state and moral disengagement, in which individuals primed with attachment security were able to withstand moral disengagement. In Study 1, we demonstrate that the securely attached behave more ethically than the anxiously attached in an achievement context. In Study 2, we show that secure attachment overrides one's natural propensity to morally disengage. In Study 3, we find that secure attachment minimizes the impact of the propensity to morally disengage through the mechanism of threat construal. Within both student and working adult samples and using both judgment and behavioral dependent variables, we show that the priming of secure attachment is a relatively simple and effective intervention that managers, educators, and organizations can use to reduce unethical behavior.

AB - We propose an ethical intervention leading to improved ethical decision-making. Moral disengagement has long been related to unethical decision-making. We test an ethical intervention in which this relationship is broken. Our ethical intervention consisted of priming individuals to be securely-attached, in which they recalled a past instance of relational support and acceptance. We predicted and found an interaction between attachment state and moral disengagement, in which individuals primed with attachment security were able to withstand moral disengagement. In Study 1, we demonstrate that the securely attached behave more ethically than the anxiously attached in an achievement context. In Study 2, we show that secure attachment overrides one's natural propensity to morally disengage. In Study 3, we find that secure attachment minimizes the impact of the propensity to morally disengage through the mechanism of threat construal. Within both student and working adult samples and using both judgment and behavioral dependent variables, we show that the priming of secure attachment is a relatively simple and effective intervention that managers, educators, and organizations can use to reduce unethical behavior.

KW - Attachment theory

KW - Ethical intervention

KW - Ethics

KW - Moral disengagement

KW - Morality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890851198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.005

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 88

EP - 93

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -