You'll spoil your dinner: Attenuating hedonic contrast in meals through cuisine mismatch

Jacob Lahne, Richard Pepino, Debra Zellner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research (Lahne & Zellner, 2015) has shown that hedonic contrast occurs in a multi-coursed meal such that good appetizers reduce the hedonic evaluation of an entrée. This paper extends that finding by examining whether hedonic contrast between courses served in a real restaurant meal can be attenuated or eliminated through a categorical mismatch of cuisine (Italian vs Thai). Subjects (N = 143) ate a meal in a University teaching restaurant in which the cuisine of the appetizer (soup) was manipulated so that it either matched (Italian minestrone) or did not match (Thai tom kha) the main course (Italian pasta aglio e olio). Subjects reported on their affective response to the meal. When the cuisine matched, hedonic contrast occurred: good minestrone caused subjects to like the same pasta – and the entire meal – significantly less. However, when the cuisine did not match there was no evidence of contrast: good tom kha did not depress liking ratings for the pasta dish, and in fact the overall meal was rated as better with the good appetizer. Thus, hedonic contrast can be attenuated by a mismatch of cuisine category. This research has important implications for restaurants, in that it both provides further evidence that main courses may be negatively affected by appetizers that are “too good”, and that actively varying the cuisine categories of dishes between menu sections may ameliorate this effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-106
Number of pages6
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume56
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

cuisine
dinner
Pleasure
appetizers
meals (menu)
Meals
Restaurants
pasta
restaurants
menu planning
soups
Research
Teaching

Keywords

  • Consumer research
  • Context
  • Cuisine
  • Hedonic contrast
  • Meals

Cite this

Lahne, Jacob ; Pepino, Richard ; Zellner, Debra. / You'll spoil your dinner : Attenuating hedonic contrast in meals through cuisine mismatch. In: Food Quality and Preference. 2017 ; Vol. 56. pp. 101-106.
@article{6141c313bb63411e832f4b2d3b8c88d8,
title = "You'll spoil your dinner: Attenuating hedonic contrast in meals through cuisine mismatch",
abstract = "Previous research (Lahne & Zellner, 2015) has shown that hedonic contrast occurs in a multi-coursed meal such that good appetizers reduce the hedonic evaluation of an entr{\'e}e. This paper extends that finding by examining whether hedonic contrast between courses served in a real restaurant meal can be attenuated or eliminated through a categorical mismatch of cuisine (Italian vs Thai). Subjects (N = 143) ate a meal in a University teaching restaurant in which the cuisine of the appetizer (soup) was manipulated so that it either matched (Italian minestrone) or did not match (Thai tom kha) the main course (Italian pasta aglio e olio). Subjects reported on their affective response to the meal. When the cuisine matched, hedonic contrast occurred: good minestrone caused subjects to like the same pasta – and the entire meal – significantly less. However, when the cuisine did not match there was no evidence of contrast: good tom kha did not depress liking ratings for the pasta dish, and in fact the overall meal was rated as better with the good appetizer. Thus, hedonic contrast can be attenuated by a mismatch of cuisine category. This research has important implications for restaurants, in that it both provides further evidence that main courses may be negatively affected by appetizers that are “too good”, and that actively varying the cuisine categories of dishes between menu sections may ameliorate this effect.",
keywords = "Consumer research, Context, Cuisine, Hedonic contrast, Meals",
author = "Jacob Lahne and Richard Pepino and Debra Zellner",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.10.002",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "101--106",
journal = "Food Quality and Preference",
issn = "0950-3293",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

You'll spoil your dinner : Attenuating hedonic contrast in meals through cuisine mismatch. / Lahne, Jacob; Pepino, Richard; Zellner, Debra.

In: Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 56, 01.03.2017, p. 101-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - You'll spoil your dinner

T2 - Attenuating hedonic contrast in meals through cuisine mismatch

AU - Lahne, Jacob

AU - Pepino, Richard

AU - Zellner, Debra

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Previous research (Lahne & Zellner, 2015) has shown that hedonic contrast occurs in a multi-coursed meal such that good appetizers reduce the hedonic evaluation of an entrée. This paper extends that finding by examining whether hedonic contrast between courses served in a real restaurant meal can be attenuated or eliminated through a categorical mismatch of cuisine (Italian vs Thai). Subjects (N = 143) ate a meal in a University teaching restaurant in which the cuisine of the appetizer (soup) was manipulated so that it either matched (Italian minestrone) or did not match (Thai tom kha) the main course (Italian pasta aglio e olio). Subjects reported on their affective response to the meal. When the cuisine matched, hedonic contrast occurred: good minestrone caused subjects to like the same pasta – and the entire meal – significantly less. However, when the cuisine did not match there was no evidence of contrast: good tom kha did not depress liking ratings for the pasta dish, and in fact the overall meal was rated as better with the good appetizer. Thus, hedonic contrast can be attenuated by a mismatch of cuisine category. This research has important implications for restaurants, in that it both provides further evidence that main courses may be negatively affected by appetizers that are “too good”, and that actively varying the cuisine categories of dishes between menu sections may ameliorate this effect.

AB - Previous research (Lahne & Zellner, 2015) has shown that hedonic contrast occurs in a multi-coursed meal such that good appetizers reduce the hedonic evaluation of an entrée. This paper extends that finding by examining whether hedonic contrast between courses served in a real restaurant meal can be attenuated or eliminated through a categorical mismatch of cuisine (Italian vs Thai). Subjects (N = 143) ate a meal in a University teaching restaurant in which the cuisine of the appetizer (soup) was manipulated so that it either matched (Italian minestrone) or did not match (Thai tom kha) the main course (Italian pasta aglio e olio). Subjects reported on their affective response to the meal. When the cuisine matched, hedonic contrast occurred: good minestrone caused subjects to like the same pasta – and the entire meal – significantly less. However, when the cuisine did not match there was no evidence of contrast: good tom kha did not depress liking ratings for the pasta dish, and in fact the overall meal was rated as better with the good appetizer. Thus, hedonic contrast can be attenuated by a mismatch of cuisine category. This research has important implications for restaurants, in that it both provides further evidence that main courses may be negatively affected by appetizers that are “too good”, and that actively varying the cuisine categories of dishes between menu sections may ameliorate this effect.

KW - Consumer research

KW - Context

KW - Cuisine

KW - Hedonic contrast

KW - Meals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991721723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84991721723

VL - 56

SP - 101

EP - 106

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

SN - 0950-3293

ER -